Scientists Debate How to Search for Life on Europa in New Mission

Europa

Jupiter’s ice-covered moon Europa hides a water ocean beneath its surface. A return mission is now planned to help search for evidence of life there. Photo Credit: NASA/JPL

Jupiter’s moon Europa, with its subsurface ocean, is considered by many to be the best place in the Solar System to search for extraterrestrial life. With NASA now committing itself to a new mission sometime in the 2020s, the focus is turning to what would be the best strategy for looking for any life which may be there. Over 200 scientists and engineers met at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Mountain View, Calif., last week for a workshop called the The Potential for Finding Life in a Europa Plume to do just that.

As NASA science administrator John Grunsfeld told the meeting: “We’re going to do a Europa mission. If there’s something trapped in that water, and we potentially have the opportunity to see it, it could be transformative.”

Europa may have geysers of water vapor erupting from the ocean below, as in this artist's conception. If so, they could be sampled and analyzed for possible evidence of life. Image Credit: NASA/ESA/K. Retherford/SWRI

Europa may have geysers of water vapor erupting from the ocean below, as in this artist’s conception. If so, they could be sampled and analyzed for possible evidence of life. Image Credit: NASA/ESA/K. Retherford/SWRI

Indeed. Many people, scientists, and non-scientists alike have been calling for a new mission to Europa. Now that NASA itself is willing to do it, the question is how to search for evidence of life. Ambitious ideas have included landers and eventually a probe that could penetrate the ice shell covering the ocean and enter the water itself. Such technically advanced missions are still quite a ways off, but in the meantime the idea of an orbiter gained ground, or at least a probe which could make repeated flybys of the moon.

Along this line of thought, the Europa Clipper concept was born. Due to the very high radiation in this region around Europa and Jupiter, the probe wouldn’t remain in orbit, but rather make repeated close flybys of Europa. Clipper would study Europa’s surface and interior to better understand the geological structure of the moon and the composition of the ocean. It would be difficult to search for life itself this way, but much could be learned about the potential habitability of Europa, similar to how the current Mars rovers are focusing on determining past habitability rather than looking for life itself.

While that would be exciting in its own right, the big question is still whether Europa could be hosting life of some kind now. Europa is a long way away, much farther than Mars, so it would seem expedient that if you are going to go all the way back there again, then at least some kind of life-search capabilities should be included in the design of the probe.

Hubble Space Telescope image of Europa showing area where water vapor was detected emanating from the surface in 2012. Image Credit: NASA/ESA/L. Roth/SWRI/University of Cologne

Hubble Space Telescope image of Europa showing area where water vapor was detected emanating from the surface in 2013. Image Credit: NASA/ESA/L. Roth/SWRI/University of Cologne

A discovery made in 2013 by the Hubble Space Telescope may make it easier for scientists to do just that: huge plumes of water vapor were reported coming from Europa’s surface. Was Europa venting its water similar to how Saturn’s moon Enceladus does? If so, then a probe could fly through them and sample them, just like the Cassini spacecraft has already done with Enceladus’ water vapor geysers. That would be a much easier way to analyze what is in the water coming up to the surface from below. Indeed, Cassini’s analysis of Enceladus’ plumes has already found water vapor, ice particles, salts, and organics. Cassini isn’t equipped, however, to detect life itself, such as bacteria.

The only problem with this is that since then, Europa’s plumes haven’t been seen again. This suggests that they may be sporadic or perhaps not even really there after all. But if they are and can be confirmed, they would provide an ideal way for a probe such as Europa Clipper to look for traces of life without having to land or bore through the ice.

Mass spectrometry could be used to look for complex chemicals which might indicate life processes. Even if living cells such as bacteria died while being injected into space, they could still be identified. “Death is just another form of life,” as planetary scientist Chris McKay noted.

Even antibodies might be useful, as they could be attached to a chip, grabbing any organic particles for analysis by other instruments on the spacecraft, McKay suggested.

The Europa Clipper concept mission. The probe would make repeated flybys of Europa, studying its surface and interior. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

The Europa Clipper concept mission. The probe would make repeated flybys of Europa, studying its surface and interior. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

So what else could be done if the plumes are not seen again? One idea, from Charles Hibbitts of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Md., is to punch into the surface ice. A precision projectile would be shot into the ice from a probe, similar to how the Deep Impact mission sent a small projectile smashing into the surface of a comet in 2005. Material in the resulting plume could then be collected and analyzed by the probe. Since the surface ice crust is thought to be several miles thick in most places, the projectile wouldn’t hit the ocean itself, but could still allow scientists the ability to examine the composition of the ice itself. There are, however, also thought to be smaller lakes of water within the ice crust, closer to the surface. If such a spot could be found, a projectile could be aimed there, offering perhaps a better chance of finding material from, or at least closer to, a body of liquid water.

Tiny satellites like cubesats are another possibility, as suggested by David Mauro of NASA Ames. Two small satellites, together called Europa Plume Chaser, would be sent to Jupiter with cameras and miniaturized instruments. One probe would search for plumes, while the other would actually fly through them and analyze them. Such a mission might be more cost effective, if the plumes can be verified.

The mantra for the search for life elsewhere has long been “follow the water.” Europa provides an unique opportunity to do that, along with some other moons like Enceladus. Now that there is finally a firm commitment to returning to Europa, the mission needs to actually move forward, and the sooner the better, since it takes several years just to get there, even with the fastest rockets. “The clock is ticking,” Grunsfeld said. “I just hope we don’t miss this remarkable opportunity.”

 

Want to keep up-to-date with all things space? Be sure to “Like” AmericaSpace on Facebook and follow us on Twitter: @AmericaSpace

5 comments to Scientists Debate How to Search for Life on Europa in New Mission

  • Byron Hood

    I’m excited about a mission to Europa, and I’m sure this is something the public (that is to say, the American taxpayer) will get behind.

  • “A precision projectile would be shot into the ice from a probe, similar to how the Deep Impact mission sent a small projectile smashing into the surface of a comet in 2005. Material in the resulting plume could then be collected and analyzed by the probe.”

    Another possibility is to return the particles collected by such a device for a much more in depth analysis back here on Earth. A similar sample return mission has been contemplated for Enceladus as a Discovery-class mission. The same hardware could be readily adapted for a nine-year sample return mission to Europa (with possible bonus collections from the volcanic plumes of Io or even the gossamer rings of Jupiter indirectly sampling Amlathea in the process).

    http://www.drewexmachina.com/2014/03/27/a-europa-io-sample-return-mission/

  • Glad to see that such missions are being considered. A dedicated Europa mission can and should include a lander, ice penetrator and sample-return capabilities. We have the technological capability to include all three and with the distance and time involved, it only makes sense.

  • […] This article was first published on AmericaSpace. […]

  • Jeff Wright

    This should be put off until funds can be accululated for a JIMO type mission atop a Block 1A SLS, with its own lander.