The Changing Bright Spots of Ceres: New Evidence for Geological Activity?

Artist’s conception based on a detailed map of the surface compiled from images taken from NASA’s Dawn spacecraft in orbit around the dwarf planet Ceres. New observations show that the bright spots change in brightness from day to night, suggesting that they change under the influence of sunlight as Ceres rotates, and may also indicate subsurface geological activity. Image Credit: ESO/L.Calçada/NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDA/Steve Albers/N. Risinger (skysurvey.org)

Artist’s illustration of the brights spots Occator crater and elsewhere, based on a detailed map of the surface compiled from images taken from NASA’s Dawn spacecraft in orbit around the dwarf planet Ceres. New observations show that the bright spots change in brightness from day to night, suggesting that they change under the influence of sunlight as Ceres rotates, and may also indicate subsurface geological activity. Image Credit: ESO/L.Calçada/NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDA/Steve Albers/N. Risinger (skysurvey.org)

Ceres is the king of the asteroid belt, being the largest object in that region of the Solar System, and the Dawn spacecraft has shown it to be a very interesting world. While it is relatively small, classified as a dwarf planet, and very cold being so far from the Sun, there are hints that it has been surprisingly geologically active in the past and perhaps still is. Superficially it resembles the Moon or Mercury, gray and covered in craters. But there are also canyons, hazes, and unusual bright spots. Those spots have become a focus of much interest for scientists, and now new studies indicate that they appear to change in brightness from day to night, and may be evidence of ongoing activity inside Ceres.

The new observations, complimenting those from NASA’s Dawn spacecraft, come from astronomers at the La Silla Observatory in Chile, run by the European Southern Observatory (ESO). They used the HARPS spectrograph on the ESO 3.9-meter telescope to obtain very precise measurements of the spots, revealing not only the motion of the spots as Ceres rotates but also variations in the brightness of the spots between day and night. The team observed Ceres during two nights in July and August 2015. The new paper is available here.

The best view so far of the odd bright spots in Occator crater, now thought to be salt deposits. New images coming from the lowest orbit will be even better. Photo Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDA

The best view so far of the odd bright spots in Occator crater, now thought to be salt deposits. New images coming from the lowest orbit will be even better. Photo Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDA

Closer view of the bright spots in Occator crater.

Closer view of the bright spots in Occator crater. Photo Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDA

There are numerous bright spots on Ceres, such as these ones, but none are as prominent as the ones in Occator crater. Photo Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDA

There are numerous bright spots on Ceres, such as these ones, but none are as prominent as the ones in Occator crater. Photo Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/IDA

According to Paolo Molaro, lead author of the new study: “As soon as the Dawn spacecraft revealed the mysterious bright spots on the surface of Ceres, I immediately thought of the possible measurable effects from Earth. As Ceres rotates the spots approach the Earth and then recede again, which affects the spectrum of the reflected sunlight arriving at Earth.”

Being able to detect the motion of the spots was expected, but the additional observations of variations with the spots themselves were a surprise.

“The result was a surprise,” noted Antonino Lanza, at the INAF–Catania Astrophysical Observatory and co-author of the study. “We did find the expected changes to the spectrum from the rotation of Ceres, but with considerable other variations from night to night.”

So what is the cause of these changes? As the team explained, the answer is likely that there are volatile substances in the spots, such as exposed water ice or hydrated magnesium sulfates, which evaporate when sunlight hits them. During this time, plumes form which reflect the sunlight, making the spots appear brighter. But then the plumes tend to evaporate quickly, causing the spots to dim again. This cycle repeats each day and night on Ceres, which produces the observed changes, as well as other various random patterns, on both short-term and long-term timescales.

Previous observations from Dawn have supported the interpretation of the material in the spots being some form of salt which is deposited after water or ice evaporates. Two new studies have been published in the journal Nature regarding the salt deposits, here and here. One of the new studies, led by Andreas Nathues at Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Göttingen, Germany, has shown that the bright deposits are consistent with a type of magnesium sulfate called hexahydrite. Epsom salt is another type of magnesium sulfate. Nathues suggests that the salt deposits were left behind in places where the water-ice sublimated off the surface, since Ceres has no atmosphere to speak of, after being exposed by meteorite or asteroid impacts. Over 130 bright spots have been discovered on Ceres by the Dawn spacecraft.

“The global nature of Ceres’ bright spots suggests that this world has a subsurface layer that contains briny water-ice,” Nathues said. He notes, however, that “The whole picture we do not have yet.”

The brightest and most well-known spots are the ones in Occator crater, which can be easily seen even some distance away from Ceres. They consist of at least 10 individual spots, clustered close together.

According to Chris Russell, principal investigator of the Dawn mission, as reported in Gizmodo: “We believe this is a huge salt deposit. We know it’s not ice and we’re pretty sure it’s salt, but we don’t know exactly what salt at the present time.”

The ESO 3.9 meter Telescope. Image Credit: Iztok Bončina/ESO

The ESO 3.9-meter telescope. Photo Credit:
Iztok Bončina/ESO

It is theorized that the water or ice comes up to the surface from below, perhaps from impacts or as a form of cryovolcanism, meaning that Ceres is still geologically active today. The spots in Occator may also have a connection with hazes seen inside that crater. From one of the new papers:

“These unusual areas are consistent with hydrated magnesium sulfates mixed with dark background material, although other compositions are possible. Of particular interest is a bright pit on the floor of crater Occator that exhibits probable sublimation of water ice, producing haze clouds inside the crater that appear and disappear with a diurnal rhythm. Slow-moving condensed-ice or dust particles, may explain this haze. We conclude that Ceres must have accreted material from beyond the ‘snow line’11, which is the distance from the Sun at which water molecules condense.”

“The Dawn science team is still discussing these results and analyzing data to better understand what is happening at Occator,” noted Russell.

The mystery spots have certainly been a source of fascination for scientists and the public alike; because they are relatively quite bright, they stand out against the otherwise grayish and rather bland landscape. For the most part, Ceres is pockmarked by many craters, indicating an ancient and battered surface, but the spots hint at other processes still ongoing today.

One other unusual feature is the so-called “Lonely Mountain,” a tall conical hill which sits in the middle of nowhere all by itself. Dawn just returned the best images so far of this intriguing mountain. Such formations were not expected to be found on Ceres, due to its small size and presumed lack of geological activity, pre-Dawn mission. But again, Ceres has surprised scientists. The hill, formally called Ahuna Mons, is about 3 miles (5 kilometers) tall and 12 miles (20 kilometers) across at the base. It is higher than Mount Rainier in Washington and Mount Whitney in California, for comparison.

“Ceres has defied our expectations and surprised us in many ways, thanks to a year’s worth of data from Dawn. We are hard at work on the mysteries the spacecraft has presented to us,” said Carol Raymond, deputy principal investigator for the mission, at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.

Ceres will be in the news again later this month, as there will also be a press briefing on March 22 with further updates, during the 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in The Woodlands, Texas.

This new discovery about Ceres’ spots adds to the massive amount of data still being sent back by Dawn. It also shows that Ceres is unique from other objects in the main asteroid belt, including the large asteroid Vesta, which Dawn had also visited before going to Ceres. With odd bright spots and mountains where there shouldn’t be any, there is still a lot to learn about this mysterious world.

 

Please check back with AmericaSpace for more updates about the Dawn mission.

Want to keep up-to-date with all things space? Be sure to “Like” AmericaSpace on Facebook and follow us on Twitter: @AmericaSpace

7 comments to The Changing Bright Spots of Ceres: New Evidence for Geological Activity?

  • Vladislaw

    I would like to see a lander project for this destination.

  • Vlad, I second that recommendation. Landers should an integral part of each and every planetary mission.

  • Indeed there are still so many places in the Solar system that need 🙂 a lander and orbiter, like

    Venus – some short lived Soviet(plus one accidental US) lander and a balloon missions yielded impressive results already. Conditions are super-harsh and super-interesting, making this a prime target both for science and engineering for longer-lived lander / rover / balloon missions

    Moon – yes, the far side and the poles need landers… And a couple of areas on the near side, too (Schröter’s Valley anyone?)

    Mars – what can I say. Obviously.

    Ceres – lander

    Jupiter – esp. the Galilean moons would need orbiters and landers. Everybody knows about the ocean on Europa, but also the other large moons are very, very interesting.

    Saturn – Titan lander/boat plus an orbiter, Enceladus lander. Orbiters would be very nice, too

    Uranus, Neptune – orbiters

    Pluto – orbiter at least, lander

    Those are the ones that come to mind first, but there’s more, like comets, asteroids, KBOs, smaller moons, gas giant orbiters, Mercury, etc. etc. etc.

  • Both Vlad and George are spot on. Remember: the technology is there and will continue to evolve and the “budget” to engage in such exploration is chump change.

  • Jeff Wright

    Ceres is perfect for mining.
    http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/What_smacks_into_Ceres_stays_on_Ceres_999.html

    “The study showed that in all cases, large proportions of the impact material remained in and around the impact crater. This was especially true in the icy case, Daly said.”

    If there is a lot of water–we may have to look at this:
    http://www.wired.com/2014/01/rineharts-floating-moonbase-1959/

    Huge nickel iron bits may not be far below the surface–and heavy equipment can lift huge payloads in weaker gravity. small rockets would be HLLVs there. Mass-drivers can be made smaller. Huge craft assembled and launched from the surface. Water for fuel.

    With salt brine–the old Project PACER may need a second look
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_PACER