Dream Chaser Clears Another NASA Review for Inaugural 2021 Launch

Sierra Nevada Corporation's Dream Chaser engineering test vehicle at NASA's Armstrong Flight Research Center. Photo Credit: NASA

America’s next ‘spaceplane’ recently cleared another key NASA review towards flight, checking off the next milestone on Sierra Nevada Corp’s (SNC) journey to launching their first Dream Chaser atop a ULA Atlas V rocket from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida in 2021.

The orbital vehicle for that first mission is now under construction, and the latest review, known as Integrated Review Milestone 5 (IR5), analyzed SNC’s performance of a variety of ground and flight operations, including development of the vehicle’s flight computers and software, mission simulator and Mission Control Center.

SNC also performed cargo demonstrations using high fidelity mock-ups of the vehicle and its cargo module, showing loading and unloading time and efficiency, and when all was said and done NASA declared the SNC team is on track to operate Dream Chaser in advance of the first mission.

“This milestone is a great accomplishment for the team focused on operations development and demonstration. It shows we can operate the Dream Chaser from the ground, including getting critical science in and out of the vehicle,” said John Curry, CRS-2 program director within SNC’s Space Systems business area.

The company currently holds a multi-billion dollar Commercial Resupply Services (CRS-2) program contract with NASA to fly at least six missions to resupply the International Space Station (ISS) through the first half of the 2020s, and ultimately have their eyes set on eventual crew missions.

SNC put their test article through its first free flight Approach and Landing test, ALT-1, at Armstrong Flight Research Center, CA in 2013, and the test went about as good as SNC could have hoped for, until only two of its three landing gear deployed, causing the vehicle to skid off the runway and sustain minor structural damage.

The test article then conducted a Phase Two flight test campaign in 2017, which served as a bridge between previous work with NASA’s Commercial Crew Program and the latest vehicle currently under development for the cargo only missions.

The second free flight test flew with orbital avionics software too, the same which the autonomous Dream Chaser CRS-2 cargo variant will use on its ISS missions. In doing so, SNC earned direct certification credit from NASA, eliminating the need for an orbital flight test before operational CRS-2 missions; all the testing and certifications happen on the ground and within the atmosphere.

The testing not only aids development of the orbital cargo vehicles, but the crewed version as well. Both cargo and crew variants share an 85 percent commonality, and the cargo-version can actually be made crew ready if NASA needed it.

When NASA offers up another round of Commercial Crew contracts in the coming years, SNC will put in a bid for their crew-version Dream Chaser.

NASA gave SNC the ‘GO’ to begin full production of the first orbital vehicle in Dec 2018, after clearing a thorough Critical Design Review; the culmination of many years of design work, analysis and development testing.

SNC's cargo Dream Chaser artist rendering in low Earth orbit. Credit: SNC

Many critical parts of the orbital vehicle are already complete, built and being tested, including major structural components, thermal protection system tiles and avionics hardware, which are now being integrated into the orbital vehicle assembly at SNC’s Space Systems facilities in Louisville, CO.

The spacecraft itself was actually originally designed by NASA, who did a lot of research on the vehicle in the 80′ and 90’s, based off a Russian heritage design called the Bor 4. They did thousands of hours of work on it, including wind tunnel analysis, a lot of computational fluid dynamics analysis, they conducted simulations with it, created the control laws to fly it and had a lot of astronauts come in to try it.

When SNC decided to pick a vehicle they opted against a ‘clean sheet of paper’, and decided instead to use something NASA had already put a lot of effort and research into, taking the basic design and changing it slightly.

NASA’s HL-20 at NASA’s Langley Research Center. The left image shows the HL-20 in front of the hangar at Langley, the center image shows the HL-20 undergoing testing for forced oscillation in pitch, and the right image shows people going through a series of tests to simulate launch and landing attitudes, crew seating arrangements, habitability, ingress and egress, equipment layout, maintenance and handling operations and visibility requirements during docking and landing operations. Photos Credit: NASA

NASA was looking for a spacecraft to use as a return vehicle from the ISS, so the agency competed a couple of different designs for rescuing crews in case of an emergency. One design was the X-38, the other was the HL-20 – which is now the Dream Chaser. NASA eventually decided to choose the X-38, but after working on that for several years the X-38 was abandoned also, leaving astronauts to rely exclusively on the space shuttle and Russian Soyuz.

When the first Dream Chaser arrives in Florida, it will be processed at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Operations and Checkout Building (O&C), and will then be transported to nearby Launch Complex-41 on Cape Canaveral AFS for integration atop its ULA Atlas-V rocket, then launch with up to 5,500kg (~12,100lbs) of pressurized and unpressurized cargo.

It also has the capability to dock or berth to the ISS, based on the cargo onboard and customer’s wishes (NASA). For berthing missions the vehicle will utilize a grapple fixture, and robotic trajectory analysis has already been done to ensure it would work.

The cargo Dream Chaser atop its ULA Atlas-V rocket. Image Credit: SNC

The spacecraft can remain at the ISS for over 200 days, before having to leave back for Earth with up to 1,850 kg (~4,000lbs) of cargo. It will also provides approximately 3,400kg (~7,400 lbs) of disposal capability each mission via the cargo module, which burns up in the atmosphere after separation from the Dream Chaser before reentry.

KSC’s runway will serve as the primary landing location, for obvious reasons (next to launch site and processing facilities). However, the vehicle is capable of landing on really any runway at least 8,000 feet long, anywhere around the world, without requiring specialized equipment, and SNC has been looking into landing at commercial airports for some time, having launched their “Dream Chaser-Preferred Landing Site Program” to work with spaceports and commercial airports to become designated landing sites.

With a propulsion system fueled by Nitrous Oxide and propane this also means immediate access to the spacecraft after landing, with only 10-20 minutes needed to exit the runway and keep conflicts with other aircraft using the same area to a minimum. For a nominal (planned) landing this might not mean much, but in an emergency abort (unplanned) scenario such quick access to Dream Chaser would allow other airport operations to proceed with minimal or no impact from the spacecraft’s unexpected arrival.

SNC technicians inspect the Dream Chaser engineering test article ahead of its second flight test program, expected to begin soon at Edwards AFB in California. Photo Credit: SNC

Dream Chaser would usually take 4-6 hours from ISS departure to touchdown, however SNC has stated previously that time could be narrowed to 2 hours, if needed in the event of an emergency.

Once back on the ground the vehicle will go back to the O&C, get looked over, and be readied for its next flight. Turnaround time between landing and next launch would be around 60 days, however there are a lot of other factors that go into turnaround times, such as whether or not the rocket is even ready. The Dream Chaser itself, says SNC, could be turned around in much less than 60 days, implying a flight rate annually of 4-6 missions per vehicle.

.

.

FOLLOW AmericaSpace on Facebook and Twitter!

.

.

4 comments to Dream Chaser Clears Another NASA Review for Inaugural 2021 Launch

  • Leopoldo Martínez

    Great job guys!!

  • Interesting to note that Dream Chaser could be viewed as the 21st century version of the Project Dyna-Soar program. Also, s strong resemblance to the Soviet Bor vehicle.

  • Chris

    Obviously the Dreamchaser doesn’t have a life support system (yet).
    I wonder if, in an emergency situation, astronauts in spacesuits can use the Dream Chaser to get back to earth safely…

  • Sam

    This is what should have been funded instead of Starliner. Now we’ve got yet another delayed and faulty Boeing product.